<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Way towards dreams...</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ninadthakre.com/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ninadthakre.com</link>
	<description>Way towards dreams...</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 02:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Innowe Portal - by Abhishek</title>
		<link>http://ninadthakre.com/?p=34#comment-554</link>
		<dc:creator>Abhishek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 13:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ninadthakre.com/?p=34#comment-554</guid>
		<description>cool use of joomla mate !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cool use of joomla mate !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Prevent or remove cached pages using “No archive” meta tag by Jonathan Bailey</title>
		<link>http://ninadthakre.com/?p=26#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 07:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ninadthakre.com/?p=26#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Forgive me if I am unclear, but how does this reduce content theft? Most content theft I see takes place either through the RSS feed or the page itself, not Google's cache, and Google can only cache pages that it can see, not protected ones behind a paywall.

I guess I am seeking clarification as to how this helps in that area. I don't disagree that preventing caching can be a good thing, it is just that one element that has me a bit perplexed.

Thank you for your help!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgive me if I am unclear, but how does this reduce content theft? Most content theft I see takes place either through the RSS feed or the page itself, not Google&#8217;s cache, and Google can only cache pages that it can see, not protected ones behind a paywall.</p>
<p>I guess I am seeking clarification as to how this helps in that area. I don&#8217;t disagree that preventing caching can be a good thing, it is just that one element that has me a bit perplexed.</p>
<p>Thank you for your help!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on open source software Vs closed-source software by Allen Taylor</title>
		<link>http://ninadthakre.com/?p=16#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ninadthakre.com/blog/?p=16#comment-42</guid>
		<description>I found your site on technorati and read a few of your other posts.  Keep up the good work.  I just added your RSS feed to my Google News Reader.  Looking forward to reading more from you.

Allen Taylor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found your site on technorati and read a few of your other posts.  Keep up the good work.  I just added your RSS feed to my Google News Reader.  Looking forward to reading more from you.</p>
<p>Allen Taylor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
